On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Markus Hitter <m...@jump-ing.de> wrote:
> Am 12.12.2016 um 09:34 schrieb Chris Packham:
>> Teach 'git merge' the --continue option which allows 'continuing' a
>> merge by completing it. The traditional way of completing a merge after
>> resolving conflicts is to use 'git commit'. Now with commands like 'git
>> rebase' and 'git cherry-pick' having a '--continue' option adding such
>> an option to 'git merge' presents a consistent UI.
>
> Like.
>
> While Junio is entirely right that this is redundant, the inner workings of
> Git are just voodoo for a (guessed) 95% of users out there, so a consistent
> UI is important.
>
>> DESCRIPTION
>> -----------
>> @@ -61,6 +62,9 @@ reconstruct the original (pre-merge) changes. Therefore:
>> discouraged: while possible, it may leave you in a state that is hard to
>> back out of in the case of a conflict.
>>
>> +The fourth syntax ("`git merge --continue`") can only be run after the
>> +merge has resulted in conflicts. 'git merge --continue' will take the
>> +currently staged changes and complete the merge.
>
> I think this should mention the equivalence to 'git commit'.
>
It is mentioned in the OPTIONS section where the --continue option is
documented. I could move it here but the OPTIONS section is where the
--abort synonym also has a reference to git reset --merge.
>
> Markus
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
> http://www.jump-ing.de/
