On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 09:33:59PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > > I do see a few real problems, but many false positives, too. > > Unfortunately, one of the false positives is: > > > > int foo = foo; > > On I side note I have often wondered how this actually works to avoid > the uninitialised-ness of foo. I can see how some compilers may be > fooled into thinking that foo has been set but that doesn't actually > end up with foo having a deterministic value.
Right, this is only used to shut up the compiler when it incorrectly thinks the variable is uninitialized. -Peff
