On 11/04/2016 08:13 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I wanted to be able to syntax check lots of proposed refs quickly
> (please don't ask why - it's complicated!)
> 
> So I added a --stdin option to git-check-ref-format.  Also it has
> --report-errors now too so you can get some kind of useful error
> message if it complains.
> 
> It's still not really a good batch mode but it's good enough for my
> use case.  To improve it would involve a new command line option to
> offer a suitable stdout output format.
> 
> There are three small refactoring patches and the two patches with new
> options and corresponding docs.
> 
> Thanks for your attention.
> 
> FYI I am not likely to need this again in the near future: it's a
> one-off use case.  So my effort for rework is probably limited.  I
> thought I'd share what I'd done in what I hope is a useful form,
> anyway.

Thanks for your patches. I left some comments about the individual patches.

I don't know whether this feature will be popular, but it's not a lot of
code to add it, so it would be OK with me.

Especially given that the output is not especially machine-readable, it
might be more consistent with other commands to call the new feature
`--verbose` rather than `--report-errors`.

If it is thought likely that scripts will want to leave a pipe open to
this command and feed it one query at a time, then it would be helpful
to flush stdout after each reference's result is written. If the
opposite use case is common (mass processing of refnames), we could
always add a `--buffer` option like the one that `git cat-file --batch` has.

Michael

Reply via email to