On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 08:53:30PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> >> Your commit message does not make clear if you want this "fatal" to be
>> >> grep-able (by scripts) or not. If not, please _() the string. Maybe
>> >> this to reduce work for translators
>> >>
>> >> /* TRANSLATORS: this is the prefix before usage error */
>> >> fprintf(stderr, "%s %s\n\n", _("fatal:"), msg);
>> >
>> > I don't think we translate any of our "fatal:", "error:", etc, do we?
>> > It certainly doesn't look like it in usage.c.
>>
>> I know. But those existed before the l10n starts, some of those belong
>> to plumbing messages. This one is new.
>
> We add lots of new messages which are themselves translated, and they
> still get untranslated prefixes. It seems like consistency is more
> important than translating this one spot. But then, I do not use a
> translated git myself, so I would not see the difference either way.
I'm kinda used to the half English half Vietnamese messages after so
many years (not just git). I do like the prefix translated as well.
But I guess we could leave this a is for now. At least we know the
scope of this message and will have easier time i18n-izing it when we
do the same for die(), warning() and friends.
--
Duy
