On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> wrote:
> This does not explain why the *complete and detailed* invocation must be > reported. eh. I tried to say that a report that looks like a *complete and detailed* invocation should be such, and not be misleading (and e.g. miss one out of 5 arguments printed). I haven't followed this topic at all, so I may be missing some > cruical detail. (If you say "it must happen" one more time, then I will > believe you, because for me that's simpler than to plough through a flock of > submodule topics. ;-) It doesn't have to happen; I am trying to come up with a better message. > > -- Hannes >
