On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 06:57:13PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Johannes Schindelin <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > - if (!commit->parents) {
> > > + if (!commit->parents)
> > > parent = NULL;
> > > - }
> > > else if (commit->parents->next) {
> > > /* Reverting or cherry-picking a merge commit */
> > > int cnt;
> >
> > The result becomes
> >
> > if (...)
> > single statement;
> > else if (...) {
> > multiple;
> > statements;
> > }
> >
> > which is not quite an improvement.
>
> Yet, this used to be the coding style of Git, and your statement comes
> quite as a surprise to me.
Yeah, I thought we were OK with:
if (cond)
single statement;
else {
multiple;
statements;
}
but not the other way around:
if (cond) {
multiple;
statements;
} else
single statement;
I don't know if the "else if" changes that or not, but I certainly have
written things like your patch does.
-Peff
