Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes:
> + if (data->ref_filters.nr) {
> + struct string_list_item *item;
> + int matched = 0;
> +
> + /* See if any of the patterns match. */
> + for_each_string_list_item(item, &data->ref_filters) {
> + /* Check every pattern even after we found a match so
> + * that we can determine when we should abbreviate the
> + * output. We will abbreviate the output when any of
> + * the patterns match a subpath, even if one of the
> + * patterns matches fully.
> + */
This describe "what" we do, which we can read from the code. What I
asked you to mention was "why", which cannot be read from the code.
/*
* Check all patterns even after finding a match,
* so that we can see if a match with a subpath exists.
* When a user asked for 'refs/tags/v*' and 'v1.*', both
* of which match, the user is showing her willingness
* to accept a shortened output by having the 'v1.*' in
* the acceptable refnames, so we shouldn't stop when seeing
* 'refs/tags/v1.4' matches 'refs/tags/v*'. We should show
* it as 'v1.4'.
*/
or something like that, perhaps?
