On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilo...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>> Should we plan to extend this to the interactive backend that is >>> shared between rebase -i and rebase -m, too? Or is this patch >>> already sufficient to cover them? >> >> AFAIK this is sufficient for both, in the sense that I've used it with >> git rebase -i and it works. > > That is a good news and at the same time a bit awkard one ;-) > > The mention of "passed to 'git am'" twice in the documentation and > help text would lead people to think "rebase -i" would not be > affected and (1) would need more work to do so, or (2) the user does > not want "rebase -i" to be unaffected for whatever reason, and gets > surprised to see that it actually does get affected.
I'm not sure I follow. If the user doesn't want to signoff during a rebase, they can simply not pass --signoff. If they do, they can not pass it. Am I missing something? > In any case, will queue as-is so that we won't lose the patch while > waiting for people to raise their opinions. Thanks. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
