On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > (cc-ing the git list) > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> When an object has already been exported (and thus is in the marks) it >> is flagged as SHOWN, so it will not be exported again, even if this time >> it's exported through a different ref. >> >> We don't need the object to be exported again, but we want the ref >> updated > > Yes, makes perfect sense. > > For what it's worth, > Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>
Yay! > [...] >> --- a/t/t5800-remote-helpers.sh >> +++ b/t/t5800-remote-helpers.sh >> @@ -145,4 +145,15 @@ test_expect_failure 'push new branch with old:new >> refspec' ' >> compare_refs clone HEAD server refs/heads/new-refspec >> ' >> >> +test_expect_success 'push ref with existing object' ' >> + (cd localclone && >> + git branch point-to-master master && >> + git push origin point-to-master >> + ) && >> + >> + (cd server && >> + git show-ref refs/heads/point-to-master >> + ) > > Style: if you indent like this, the test becomes clearer: And then it would become inconsistent with the rest of the file. >> + git fast-export --import-marks=tmp-marks \ >> + --export-marks=tmp-marks master > actual && >> + test_cmp expected actual > > Redirections in git shell scripts are generally spelled as > "do_something >actual", without a space between the operator and > filename. I generally am OK with adapting to whatever code-style is used (sometimes under protest), but this is a place where I draw the line. Sorry, '>actual' is more annoying to me than a knife screeching glass. Fortunately, '> actual' is used in many other places in 't/', so I'm going to use the other people jumping over the bridge argument. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
