On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Cornelius Weig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So maybe s/signed-off-by/helped-by/? >> > > This is getting real complex :-/
uh; sorry for that. I do not mind the patch as posted, just in case you reroll for another reason, this is worth thinking about. In fact, as said before I like that patch. > > As I said in the notes for the patch: > >>> As I don't know what is appropriate, I took the liberty to add >>> everybody's >>> sign-off who was involved in the discussion in alphabetic order. > > With your explanation, I guess the most accurate sign-off chain would be: > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]> (as you sent a patch) ...and here we could continue arguing. ;) Is the patch I sent note-worthy enough to be deriving work from? My gut reaction would be "no". > Helped-by: Philip Oakley <[email protected]> (no patch, but helpful) > Signed-off-by: Cornelius Weig <[email protected]> (this patch) > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> (once he decides it's good)
