Am 30.01.2017 um 23:22 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
René Scharfe <l....@web.de> writes:if (tree2->flags & UNINTERESTING) { - struct object *tmp = tree2; - tree2 = tree1; - tree1 = tmp; + SWAP(tree2, tree1);A human would have written this SWAP(tree1, tree2). Not that I think such a manual fix-up should be made in _this_ patch, which may end up mixing mechanical conversion (which we may want to keep reproducible) and hand tweaks. But this swapped swap reads somewhat silly.
Well, a human wrote "tmp = tree2" -- sometimes one likes to count down instead of up, I guess.
We can make Coccinelle order the parameters alphabetically, but I don't know how to do so without duplicating most of the semantic patch. And thats would result in e.g. SWAP(new_tree, old_tree), which might be odd as well.
I'd just leave them in whatever order they were, but that's probably because I'm lazy.
René
