On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:24 PM, SZEDER Gábor <szeder....@gmail.com> wrote: >> * sg/completion-refs-speedup (2017-02-06) 13 commits >> - squash! completion: fill COMPREPLY directly when completing refs >> - completion: fill COMPREPLY directly when completing refs >> - completion: list only matching symbolic and pseudorefs when completing >> refs >> - completion: let 'for-each-ref' sort remote branches for 'checkout' DWIMery >> - completion: let 'for-each-ref' filter remote branches for 'checkout' >> DWIMery >> - completion: let 'for-each-ref' strip the remote name from remote branches >> - completion: let 'for-each-ref' and 'ls-remote' filter matching refs >> - completion: don't disambiguate short refs >> - completion: don't disambiguate tags and branches >> - completion: support excluding full refs >> - completion: support completing full refs after '--option=refs/<TAB>' >> - completion: wrap __git_refs() for better option parsing >> - completion: remove redundant __gitcomp_nl() options from _git_commit() >> (this branch uses sg/completion.) >> >> Will hold. >> This seems to break 9902 when merged to 'pu'. > > All failing tests fail with the same error: > > fatal: unrecognized %(refname:strip=2) argument: strip=2 > > That's because of this topic: > >> * kn/ref-filter-branch-list (2017-01-31) 20 commits >> (merged to 'next' on 2017-01-31 at e7592a5461) >> + branch: implement '--format' option >> + branch: use ref-filter printing APIs >> + branch, tag: use porcelain output >> + ref-filter: allow porcelain to translate messages in the output >> + ref-filter: add an 'rstrip=<N>' option to atoms which deal with refnames >> + ref-filter: modify the 'lstrip=<N>' option to work with negative '<N>' >> + ref-filter: Do not abruptly die when using the 'lstrip=<N>' option >> + ref-filter: rename the 'strip' option to 'lstrip' > > And in particular this commit, which, well, does what it's subject > says it's doing, thus breaking backwards compatibility. >
What about making strip a deprecated variant of lstrip? Thanks, Jake
