On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > I was tempted to merge the paragraph with --edit::, but I thought this > may add confusion. The use-cases for --edit and --no-edit are really > different so I went for a separate paragraph, right below the --edit one.
Yeah, usually I think it would be better to keep the positive and negative forms together, but the way you have done it does seem a lot more clear to me. I think it is because the default flips based on other options. So you would be stuck writing something like: -e, --edit:: Edit the commit message using `$EDITOR`. This is the default unless the `-F`, `-m`, or `-C` options are used; in those cases, `-e` or `--edit` can be used to invoke the editor. Likewise, `--no-edit` can be used to suppress the editor when using an existing commit message. For example, `git commit --amend --no-edit` amends a commit without changing its commit message. Your split reads much better, IMHO. Thanks. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html