Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > ... > The rationale for doing this with --no-index is that it is > meant to be used outside a repository, and so parsing revs > at all does not make sense. > > This patch gives --untracked the same treatment. While it > _is_ meant to be used in a repository, it is explicitly > about grepping the non-repository contents. Telling the user > "we found a rev, but you are not allowed to use revs" is > not really helpful compared to "we treated your argument as > a path, and could not find it".
Yup, both sounds very sensible. Thanks.
