On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 04:02:33AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > Ugh. Actually, there are a few complications I found: > > 1. Checking "HEAD" afterwards means you can't actually have a branch > named "HEAD". Doing so is probably insane, but we probably really > _do_ want to just disallow the @-conversion here. > > 2. This isn't limited to just HEAD and @-conversion. For instance:
It's a bit what I was afraid of. Luc
