René Scharfe <l....@web.de> writes:
> Am 01.03.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * rs/log-email-subject (2017-03-01) 2 commits
>> - pretty: use fmt_output_email_subject()
>> - log-tree: factor out fmt_output_email_subject()
>>
>> Code clean-up.
>>
>> Will merge to 'next'.
>
> Could you please squash this in? We only use a single context (as
> opposed to an array), so it doesn't have to be especially compact,
> and using a bitfield slows down half of the tests in p4000 by 3%
> for me.
I thought I saw the keyword "bitfield" to the solution for that 3%
somewhere in the thread and forgot when I updated the "What's
cooking" report.
Will do. Thanks for being careful.
>
> ---
> commit.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit.h b/commit.h
> index 459daef94a..528272ac9b 100644
> --- a/commit.h
> +++ b/commit.h
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ struct pretty_print_context {
> int preserve_subject;
> struct date_mode date_mode;
> unsigned date_mode_explicit:1;
> - unsigned print_email_subject:1;
> + int print_email_subject;
> int expand_tabs_in_log;
> int need_8bit_cte;
> char *notes_message;
