Deniz Türkoglu wrote:
> I have spoken to Shawn Pearce (gerrit project lead, google) and he
> said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
> I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

I personally think email is by far the best interface for patches,
reviews, and discussions.  Git patches are very high-volume, and not
everyone can read everything.  People should have the flexibility to
choose the client they'd like to use to read patches and follow-ups;
the freedom to use a scriptable client like Gnus is very important to
me. Primarily, I want people to be able to:
1. Choose what to read, by scripting Gnus to score email that they'd
likely find relevant.
2. Try out new patches on the list, by assigning one keybinding to
git-am a series.
3. Display email the way they like.  Many email clients have features
to run filters through emails.
4. Read patches/ follow-ups offline, while travelling (on a phone, for
instance).  The GMail app, for instance, downloads mails for offline
5. Interact with other lists seamlessly (the kernel list, for
instance).  Email is a universal interface on which lists can be CC'ed

I'm not attacking a specific web interface, but I don't see how any of
the following would be possible even with the most advanced web
interface.  Besides, nobody has made a proper case for using one.
Therefore, I'm strongly opposed to the move.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to