On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> 
> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>> Is there a way to force removing unreachable objects in the presence of 
>>> broken
>>> links?
>> Does it help to forcibly expire the reflogs?
> You mean "git reflog expire --all --expire=0"?
> After that the reflog is empty, but "git gc" still fails.

Although "git stash list" didn't show anything, .git/refs/stash still contained
one hash.

After running "git stash clear", "git gc" succeeded, and the object pointed to
by .git/refs/stash before was gone.



Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to