On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:43 PM, René Scharfe <l....@web.de> wrote:
> FreeBSD implements getcwd(3) as a syscall, but falls back to a version
> based on readdir(3) if it fails for some reason. The latter requires
> permissions to read and execute path components, while the former does
> not. That means that if our buffer is too small and we're missing
> rights we could get EACCES, but we may succeed with a bigger buffer.
>
> Keep retrying if getcwd(3) indicates lack of permissions until our
> buffer can fit PATH_MAX bytes, as that's the maximum supported by the
> syscall on FreeBSD anyway. This way we do what we can to be able to
> benefit from the syscall, but we also won't loop forever if there is a
> real permission issue.
Sorry to be late and maybe I missed something obvious, but the above
and the patch seem complex to me compared with something like:
diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
index ace58e7367..25eadcbedc 100644
--- a/strbuf.c
+++ b/strbuf.c
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ int strbuf_readlink(struct strbuf *sb, const char
*path, size_t hint)
int strbuf_getcwd(struct strbuf *sb)
{
size_t oldalloc = sb->alloc;
- size_t guessed_len = 128;
+ size_t guessed_len = PATH_MAX > 128 ? PATH_MAX : 128;
for (;; guessed_len *= 2) {
strbuf_grow(sb, guessed_len);
