Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <[email protected]> writes:

> v4 adds a new patch, 2/5, which makes the hashmap related functions in
> refs.c generic, so I could add a new map for worktree ref stores and
> not abuse submodule hashmap.
>
> I mentioned about moving these hashmap back to submodule.c and
> worktree.c where it can map more than just ref stores (in worktree
> case, we can cache 'struct worktree', for example). But I'm not doing
> it now to keep things small.
>
> The commit message in 1/5 is rephrased a bit, hopefully clearer.

Michael, does this look good to replace what has been queued?

I did not spot any discussion on this topic after v4 when I skimmed
the backlog messages, so I am hoping that I can pick this up without
having to worry about seeing another reroll immediately after that
(in which case I'd have been better off if I tended other topics in
flight in the meantime).

Thanks, both.


Reply via email to