Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Phil Hord <ho...@cisco.com> writes:
>> Consider the usage:
>> git status # show work-tree status
>> git status --short # show short work-tree status
>> git status --tokens # show work-tree status in token form
> OK, your --tokens is more about *how* things are output, but it is
> unclear how it would interact with --short. I had an impression
> that you are basing your output on the short output, whose existing
> record include "##" (that shows the branch names and states), and
> "MM", "A " and friends (that show the per-file states), by adding
> new record types that shows tree-wide states.
I am, but I don't much care for the "##" prefix, especially when
combined with --null, for example. I'm inclined to remove it when
--short is not provided, specifically to give scripts an easier time of
parsing. But scripts are likely to need "--porcelain" as well, and
currently that implies "--short". But I suppose another combination
could be meaningful.
# tokens only
$ git status --tree
# tokens and short-status
$ git status --tree --short
# short-status only
$ git status --porcelain
# tokens only?
$ git status --tree --porcelain
I think this spaghettify's the ui too much. Maybe this instead:
# undecorated tokens only
$ git status --tree=porcelain
>> But maybe "--tokens" has some better meaning that someone will want to
>> use in the future. I'm not married to it. But "git status" already
>> means "Show the working tree status". So "git status --show-tree-state"
>> sounds redundant or meaningless.
> I didn't mean to say that you have to spell out all these words;
> "show" and "state" are redundant.
> The important part is that unlike the existing "per-file" state the
> "status" command is showing, the option is to add "tree-wide" state
> to the output, and my suggestion was to pick a word that makes it
> clear, rather than using "output is done using tokens" without
> saying "what is being output in tokenized form".
Thanks for clarifying.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html