On 05/17/2017 03:15 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 02:05:32PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
>
>> @@ -70,6 +61,13 @@ struct files_ref_store {
>>
>> struct ref_cache *loose;
>> struct packed_ref_cache *packed;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Iff the packed-refs file associated with this instance is
>> + * currently locked for writing, this points at the associated
>> + * lock (which is owned by somebody else).
>> + */
>> + struct lock_file *packlock;
>
> I'm glad to see you renamed this from just "lock", though the short
> "pack" makes me think of packed objects. I don't know if
> "packed_refs_lock" would be too verbose (I see it's just "packed" above,
> so maybe "packed_lock").
>
> </bikeshed>
I'll rename it to `packed_refs_lock`.
Michael
