Michael J Gruber <[email protected]> writes: > I think I should change 3/4 to display exactly those bits that name-rev > actually uses for weighing different possible descriptions; they are > differents from the "describe-bits". So please withhold 3/4 and 4/4.
OK, I think 1&2/4 from this series can progress before that as it is an end-user visible improvement. While looking at it, I also found a variable that recent "timestamp_t" series didn't notice and update, so perhaps 1&2/4 needs to be rebased on a fix for that anyway ;-) Thanks. Will hold 3&4/4 for now.
