Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes: > Is the iterator over packed-refs correctly skipping over what are > covered by loose refs? The entries in the packed-refs file that are > superseded by loose refs should be allowed to point at an already > expired object.
Here it is in a test form for easier diagnosis. t/t1408-packed-refs.sh | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t1408-packed-refs.sh b/t/t1408-packed-refs.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..35533c8593 --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t1408-packed-refs.sh @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='packed-refs entries are covered by loose refs' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success setup ' + test_tick && + git commit --allow-empty -m one && + one=$(git rev-parse HEAD) && + git for-each-ref >actual && + echo "$one commit refs/heads/master" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual && + + git pack-refs --all && + git for-each-ref >actual && + echo "$one commit refs/heads/master" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual && + + cat .git/packed-refs && + + git checkout --orphan another && + test_tick && + git commit --allow-empty -m two && + two=$(git rev-parse HEAD) && + git checkout -B master && + git branch -D another && + + cat .git/packed-refs && + + git for-each-ref >actual && + echo "$two commit refs/heads/master" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual && + + git reflog expire --expire=now --all && + git prune && + git tag -m v1.0 v1.0 master +' + +test_expect_success 'no error from stale entry in packed-refs' ' + git describe master >actual 2>&1 && + echo "v1.0" >expect && + test_cmp expect actual +' + +test_done
