On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:52 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Orgad Shaneh <[email protected]>
>
> Commit 7550424804 (name-rev: include taggerdate in considering the best
> name) introduced a bug in name-rev.
>
> If a repository has both annotated and non-annotated tags, annotated
> tag will always win, even if it was created decades after the commit.
>
> Consider a repository that always used non-annotated tags, and at some
> point started using annotated tags - name-rev --tags will return the
> first annotated tags for all the old commits (in our repository it is
> followed by ~5067 for one commit, or by ~120^2~21^2~88^2~87 for
> another...). This is obviously not what the user expects.
>
> The taggerdate should only be matched if *both tags* have it.

Please sign off the patch. See https://developercertificate.org/
or Documentation/SubmittingPatches

> ---
>  builtin/name-rev.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c
> index 92a5d8a5d2..8f77023482 100644
> --- a/builtin/name-rev.c
> +++ b/builtin/name-rev.c
> @@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ static void name_rev(struct commit *commit,
>                 commit->util = name;
>                 goto copy_data;
>         } else if (name->taggerdate > taggerdate ||
> -                       (name->taggerdate == taggerdate &&
> +                       ((taggerdate == ULONG_MAX || name->taggerdate == 
> taggerdate) &&
>                          name->distance > distance)) {
>  copy_data:
>                 name->tip_name = tip_name;
> -               name->taggerdate = taggerdate;
> +               if (taggerdate != ULONG_MAX) {
> +                       name->taggerdate = taggerdate;
> +               }

style: you may omit the braces for a single statement
after if.

>                 name->generation = generation;
>                 name->distance = distance;
>         } else
> --
> 2.13.1.windows.1.1.ga36e14b3aa
>

Reply via email to