On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Beller wrote:
>
>> Nowadays there are better tutorials out there such as "Git from bottom up"
>> or others, easily found online. Additionally to that a tutorial in our
>> test suite is not as easy to discover as e.g. online tutorials.
>>
>> This test/tutorial was discovered by the patch author in the effort to
>> migrate our tests in preparation to switch the hashing function.
>> Transforming this tutorial to be agnostic of the underlying hash function
>> would hurt its readability, hence being even less useful as a tutorial.
>>
>> Instead delete this test as
>> (a) the functionality is tested elsewhere as well and
>> (b) reducing the test suite to its core improves performance, which
>>     aids developers in keeping their development velocity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com>
>> ---
>>  t/t1200-tutorial.sh | 268 
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 268 deletions(-)
>>  delete mode 100755 t/t1200-tutorial.sh
>
> Interesting.  When I first saw the diffstat I assumed you were talking
> about a test that validates the examples in some manpage are correct.
> But this is not that.
>
> There indeed appear to be other good tests for these commands, even
> "git whatchanged", so for what it's worth,
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks.

2ae6c70674 (Adapt tutorial to cygwin and add test case, 2005-10-13)
seemed to imply that it was testing some part for Documentation/tutorial.txt
though.

Reply via email to