On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Jonathan Tan <jonathanta...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 13:36:24 -0700
> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
>> There are also packed refs, so one could (like I did) think that
>> pack.c is for generic packing of things, maybe packfile.c
>> would be more clear?
> Good point. I'll use packfile.c and packfile.h in the next version.

It looks like you used "packfile.c" and "pack.h" in v2. Is there a
reason why it's not using "packfile.h"?

Reply via email to