Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>> > The above example made me wonder if we also want a format specifier
>> > to do the above without piping, but it turns out that we already
>> > have "log --format=%(trailers)", so we are good ;-)
>> I was going to say, I thought we had a way to get trailers for a
>> commit via the pretty format, since that is what i used in the past.
> I do like that you could get the trailers for many commits in a single
> invocation. That doesn't matter for my current use-case, but obviously
> piping through O(n) interpret-trailers invocations is a bad idea.
> But there are a few difficulties with using %(trailers) for this,...
I think it is clear to you, but it may not be clear to others, that
I did not mean to say "because 'log --format' already knows about
it, this change to interpret-trailers is unnecessary".
> For (1) I think many callers would prefer to see the original
> formatting. Maybe we'd need a %(trailers:normalize) or something.
Thanks; that is exactly the line of thought I had in the back of my
head without even realizing when I brought up %(trailers) format