On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Lars Schneider
<larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15 Aug 2017, at 21:29, Christian Couder <christian.cou...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Lars Schneider
>> <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be possible to use "process->argv[0]"?
>>> Shouldn't that be the same as "cmd"?
>>
>> Well in sub-process.h there is:
>>
>> /* Members should not be accessed directly. */
>> struct subprocess_entry {
>> struct hashmap_entry ent; /* must be the first member! */
>> const char *cmd;
>> struct child_process process;
>> };
>>
>> so if cmd is always the same as process->argv[0], maybe there is no
>> need for the cmd member in the first place?
>
> The struct is a hash map entry. `cmd` is the key for a `process`.
> Therefore, I think this is still necessary.
>
> Does this make sense?
Not sure it makes sense. A quick try to remove the cmd member, failed
t0021 with:
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/christian/git/git/t/trash
directory.t0021-conversion/repo/.git/
[master (root-commit) 56d459b] test commit 1
Author: A U Thor <aut...@example.com>
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
create mode 100644 .gitattributes
--- expected.log.tmp 2017-08-15 20:27:51.658818467 +0000
+++ debug.log.tmp 2017-08-15 20:27:51.662818526 +0000
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
x IN: clean test2.r 14 [OK] -- OUT: 14 . [OK]
x IN: clean test4-empty.r 0 [OK] -- OUT: 0 [OK]
x IN: clean testsubdir/test3 'sq',$x=.r 49 [OK] -- OUT: 49 . [OK]
- 1 START
- 1 STOP
- 1 init handshake complete
+ 4 START
+ 4 STOP
+ 4 init handshake complete
not ok 15 - required process filter should filter data
and it is not clear to me why, so I guess you are right and I will
just use process->argv[0].
