Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> I _do_ think it's a misfeature to put it in check-ref-format. It should
> be part of rev-parse. Which admittedly is a kitchen sink, but this kind
> of resolving is one of the main things it should be doing. And in fact
> you can already do:
>
> git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name @{-1}
>
> But I stopped short of suggesting we remove the feature entirely. It
> would obviously require a deprecation period.
Yeah, I realize that "nonsense" was a bit too strong. I do agree
that it was a misfeature to place in "check" ref-format, though.
Thanks.
