On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Rene Scharfe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <[email protected]>
> ---
> commit.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index 8b28415939..51f969fcbc 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -1514,60 +1514,63 @@ N_("Warning: commit message did not conform to
> UTF-8.\n"
> int commit_tree_extended(const char *msg, size_t msg_len,
> const unsigned char *tree,
> struct commit_list *parents, unsigned char *ret,
> const char *author, const char *sign_commit,
> struct commit_extra_header *extra)
> {
> int result;
> int encoding_is_utf8;
> struct strbuf buffer;
>
> assert_sha1_type(tree, OBJ_TREE);
>
> if (memchr(msg, '\0', msg_len))
> return error("a NUL byte in commit log message not allowed.");
>
> /* Not having i18n.commitencoding is the same as having utf-8 */
> encoding_is_utf8 = is_encoding_utf8(git_commit_encoding);
>
> strbuf_init(&buffer, 8192); /* should avoid reallocs for the headers
> */
> strbuf_addf(&buffer, "tree %s\n", sha1_to_hex(tree));
>
> /*
> * NOTE! This ordering means that the same exact tree merged with a
> * different order of parents will be a _different_ changeset even
> * if everything else stays the same.
> */
> while (parents) {
> struct commit *parent = pop_commit(&parents);
> strbuf_addf(&buffer, "parent %s\n",
> oid_to_hex(&parent->object.oid));
> }
>
> /* Person/date information */
> if (!author)
> author = git_author_info(IDENT_STRICT);
> strbuf_addf(&buffer, "author %s\n", author);
> strbuf_addf(&buffer, "committer %s\n",
> git_committer_info(IDENT_STRICT));
> if (!encoding_is_utf8)
> strbuf_addf(&buffer, "encoding %s\n", git_commit_encoding);
>
> while (extra) {
> add_extra_header(&buffer, extra);
> extra = extra->next;
> }
> strbuf_addch(&buffer, '\n');
>
> /* And add the comment */
> strbuf_add(&buffer, msg, msg_len);
>
> /* And check the encoding */
> if (encoding_is_utf8 && !verify_utf8(&buffer))
> fprintf(stderr, _(commit_utf8_warn));
>
> - if (sign_commit && do_sign_commit(&buffer, sign_commit))
> - return -1;
> + if (sign_commit && do_sign_commit(&buffer, sign_commit)) {
> + result = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
While this seems obviously correct (following the "goto cleanup" pattern),
I shortly wondered if it can be expressed more concisely, as we really skip
only one call:
if (!sign_commit || !do_sign_commit(&buffer, sign_commit))
result = write_sha1_file(...)
else
result = -1;
strbuf_release(&buffer);
return result;
Instead of an if, we could even inline it as
result = (!sign_commit || !do_sign_commit(&buffer, sign_commit)) ?
write_sha1_file(buffer.buf, buffer.len, commit_type, ret) : -1;
strbuf_release(&buffer);
I am not sure if this is easier to read (maybe that is too dense?)
Just thought for food, the original patch looks good, too.
Thanks,
Stefan