On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:

> diff --git a/commit-slab.h b/commit-slab.h
> index 333d81e37..dcaab8ca0 100644
> --- a/commit-slab.h
> +++ b/commit-slab.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static MAYBE_UNUSED void init_ ##slabname(struct slabname 
> *s)               \
>                                                                       \
>  static MAYBE_UNUSED void clear_ ##slabname(struct slabname *s)               
> \
>  {                                                                    \
> -     int i;                                                          \
> +     unsigned int i;                                                 \
>       for (i = 0; i < s->slab_count; i++)                             \
>               free(s->slab[i]);                                       \
>       s->slab_count = 0;                                              \
> @@ -89,13 +89,13 @@ static MAYBE_UNUSED elemtype *slabname## _at_peek(struct 
> slabname *s,     \
>                                                 const struct commit *c, \
>                                                 int add_if_missing)   \
>  {                                                                    \
> -     int nth_slab, nth_slot;                                         \
> +     unsigned int nth_slab, nth_slot;                                \

I have a feeling that in the long run these should all be size_t, but
it's probably pretty unlikely to overflow in practice. At any rate, the
slab index itself is an unsigned, so it probably makes sense to match
that for now.

-Peff

Reply via email to