On 31/03/16 13:39, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Andy Lowry <andy.w...@nglowry.com> writes: > >> So I think now that the script should do "update-index --refresh" >> followed by "diff-index --quiet HEAD". Sound correct? > > Yes. That has always been one of the kosher ways for any script to > make sure that the files in the working tree that are tracked have > not been modified relative to HEAD (assuming that the index matches > HEAD).
Too bad kernel/scripts/setlocalversion didn't get the memo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cdf2bc632ebc9ef51 > scripts/setlocalversion on write-protected source tree (2013) > I don't see how removing "git update-index" could do any harm. This causes a spurious "-dirty" suffix when building from a directory copy (as Mike learned the hard way) ---- PS: I used NNTP and http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git to quickly find this old thread (what could we do without NNTP?). Then I googled for a web archive of this thread and Google could only find this one: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/BUG-in-git-diff-index-tt7652105.html#none Is there a robots.txt to block indexing on https://public-inbox.org/git/1459432667.2124.2.ca...@dwim.me ?
