On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:22:37PM -0700, Taylor Blau wrote:

> In preparation to support additional sub-arguments given to the "%(trailers)"
> atom, use 'format_trailers_from_commit' in order to format trailers in the
> desired manner.

This isn't just in preparation, is it? It looks like the options are
here (which I think is fine, but the commit message probably needs
updated).

> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <m...@ttaylorr.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt |  6 +++++-
>  ref-filter.c                       | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh            | 40 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

This patch didn't apply for me on top of the others. I get:

  Applying: ref-filter.c: use trailer_opts to format trailers
  error: patch failed: ref-filter.c:178
  error: ref-filter.c: patch does not apply
  Patch failed at 0004 ref-filter.c: use trailer_opts to format trailers

And then with "am -3":

  Applying: ref-filter.c: use trailer_opts to format trailers
  error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (ref-filter.c).
  error: could not build fake ancestor
  Patch failed at 0004 ref-filter.c: use trailer_opts to format trailers

Did it get corrupted in transit, or did you hand-edit it?

> diff --git a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt 
> b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
> index 03e187a10..b7325a25d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt
> @@ -213,7 +213,11 @@ line is 'contents:body', where body is all of the lines 
> after the first
>  blank line.  The optional GPG signature is `contents:signature`.  The
>  first `N` lines of the message is obtained using `contents:lines=N`.
>  Additionally, the trailers as interpreted by 
> linkgit:git-interpret-trailers[1]
> -are obtained as 'contents:trailers'.
> +are obtained as 'contents:trailers'. Non-trailer lines from the trailer block
> +can be omitted with 'trailers:only'. Whitespace-continuations can be removed
> +from trailers so that each trailer appears on a line by itself with its full
> +content with 'trailers:unfold'. Both can be used together as
> +'trailers:unfold,only'.

I know you copied the single-quote formatting from the existing line,
but this may be a good opportunity to switch to backticks, which is what
we usually prefer these days for literal phrases.

> diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> index 84f14093c..8573acbed 100644
> --- a/ref-filter.c
> +++ b/ref-filter.c
> @@ -178,9 +178,23 @@ static void subject_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom, 
> const char *arg)
>  
>  static void trailers_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom, const char *arg)
>  {
> -     if (arg)
> -             die(_("%%(trailers) does not take arguments"));
> +     struct string_list params = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
> +     int i;
> +
> +     if (arg) {
> +             string_list_split(&params, arg, ',', -1);
> +             for (i = 0; i < params.nr; i++) {
> +                     const char *s = params.items[i].string;
> +                     if (!strcmp(s, "unfold"))
> +                             atom->u.contents.trailer_opts.unfold = 1;
> +                     else if (!strcmp(s, "only"))
> +                             atom->u.contents.trailer_opts.only_trailers = 1;
> +                     else
> +                             die(_("unknown %%(trailers) argument: %s"), s);
> +             }
> +     }
>       atom->u.contents.option = C_TRAILERS;
> +     string_list_clear(&params, 0);
>  }

This looks good (and so much nicer than the contortions from pretty.c).
The error behavior matches what we currently do for %(align), which
makes sense.

The trailer_opts should be zero-initialized to start with due to us
calling memset on the whole used_atom struct.

>  static void contents_atom_parser(struct used_atom *atom, const char *arg)
> @@ -1035,7 +1049,7 @@ static void grab_sub_body_contents(struct atom_value 
> *val, int deref, struct obj
>                       name++;
>               if (strcmp(name, "subject") &&
>                   strcmp(name, "body") &&
> -                 strcmp(name, "trailers") &&
> +                 !starts_with(name, "trailers") &&
>                   !starts_with(name, "contents"))
>                       continue;
>               if (!subpos)
> @@ -1060,13 +1074,12 @@ static void grab_sub_body_contents(struct atom_value 
> *val, int deref, struct obj
>                       append_lines(&s, subpos, contents_end - subpos, 
> atom->u.contents.nlines);
>                       v->s = strbuf_detach(&s, NULL);
>               } else if (atom->u.contents.option == C_TRAILERS) {
> -                     struct trailer_info info;
> +                     struct strbuf s = STRBUF_INIT;
>  
> -                     /* Search for trailer info */
> -                     trailer_info_get(&info, subpos);
> -                     v->s = xmemdupz(info.trailer_start,
> -                                     info.trailer_end - info.trailer_start);
> -                     trailer_info_release(&info);
> +                     /* Format the trailer info according to the 
> trailer_opts given */
> +                     format_trailers_from_commit(&s, subpos, 
> &atom->u.contents.trailer_opts);
> +
> +                     v->s = strbuf_detach(&s, NULL);

And this all looks straightforward and correct.

> diff --git a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
> index 2a9fcf713..2bd0c5da7 100755
> --- a/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh
> +++ b/t/t6300-for-each-ref.sh

The tests are basically an adaptation of the ones from 58311c66fd
(pretty: support normalization options for %(trailers), 2017-08-15),
which make sense.

One thing I did notice:

> @@ -610,6 +613,43 @@ test_expect_success 'set up trailers for next test' '
>       EOF
>  '
>  
> +test_expect_success '%(trailers:unfold) unfolds trailers' '
> +  git for-each-ref --format="%(trailers:unfold)" refs/heads/master >actual &&
> +  {
> +    unfold <trailers
> +    echo
> +  } >expect &&
> +  test_cmp expect actual
> +'

This looks like two-space indentation, when it should be a tab.

> +test_expect_success '%(trailers:only) shows only "key: value" trailers' '
> +     git for-each-ref --format="%(trailers:only)" refs/heads/master >actual 
> &&
> +     {
> +             grep -v patch.description <trailers &&
> +             echo
> +     } >expect &&
> +     test_cmp expect actual
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success '%(trailers:only) and %(trailers:unfold) work together' '
> +     git for-each-ref --format="%(trailers:only,unfold)" refs/heads/master 
> >actual &&
> +     git for-each-ref --format="%(trailers:unfold,only)" refs/heads/master 
> >reverse &&
> +     test_cmp actual reverse &&
> +     {
> +             grep -v patch.description <trailers | unfold &&
> +             echo
> +     } >expect &&
> +     test_cmp expect actual
> +'

These ones are tabs. GOod.


> +test_expect_success '%(trailers) rejects unknown trailers arguments' '
> +     cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> +     fatal: unknown %(trailers) argument: unsupported
> +     EOF
> +  test_must_fail git for-each-ref --format="%(trailers:unsupported)" 
> 2>actual &&
> +  test_cmp expect actual
> +'

But this one is mixed. :)

-Peff

Reply via email to