On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:35:45AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau <m...@ttaylorr.com> writes: > > >> Is this just me who wants to do s/fenc/quot/g? Unless somebody > >> objects, I'd do so while queuing. > > > > I don't object, I think that fencing is less appropriate than quoting. > > I couldn't find the term myself when writing this commit :-). > > > > I am happy to send out v5 of this patch series with this commit > > re-written, or you can change it while queuing. Whichever is easier for > > you. > > Just FYI, here is what I ended up with. I do not think this is > about "modern" vs "old style"; it is more about using the more > appropriate mark-up and our desire has always been to use `literal` > for things that users need to type literally.
I think it was my earlier comment that led to the modern/old notion. A lot of the old code does use single-quotes haphazardly. I'm not sure if it's "old style" or just "we were less careful" then. Either way, the patch looks good to me. I also think fencing isn't the right word; that word implies to me a multi-line block like --------------------------- this is fenced --------------------------- -Peff
