On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:12:58AM -0700, Taylor Blau wrote: > > I know this is getting _really_ subjective, but IMHO this is a lot more > > reasoning than the comment needs. The commit message goes into the > > details of the "why", but here I'd have just written something like: > > > > /* treat "%(foo:)" the same as "%(foo)"; i.e., no arguments */ > > I sent an updated v2 of this "series" (without a cover-letter) that > shortens this comment to more or less what you suggested. I've kept the > commit message longer, since I think that that information is useful > within "git blame".
Yeah, sorry if I wasn't clear: definitely the commit message is fine and is the place to go into the detail and rationale. -Peff
