On 10/11, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> On 10/12, Takahito Ogawa wrote:
> > "git stash" behavior without any arguments was changed in
> > 1ada5020b ("stash: use stash_push for no verb form", 2017-02-28).
> > This is equivalent to "git stash push" but documents says
> > "git stash save".
> >
> > Correct it.
>
> Thanks for fixing this! I recently sent a patch that would advertise
> git stash push more in general, which would also fix this occurrence [1],
> but it didn't seem like it got much interest. However this is
> obviously correct, and should definitely be fixed, while the other
> places can still mention 'git stash save'.
>
> For what it's worth this is
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gummerer <[email protected]>
And I forgot to include the link, sorry. Here it is:
[1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/20171005200049.GF30301@hank/
>
> > Signed-off-by: Takahito Ogawa <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/git-stash.txt | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-stash.txt b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > index 00f95fee1..63642c145 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-stash.txt
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ and reverts the working directory to match the `HEAD`
> > commit.
> > The modifications stashed away by this command can be listed with
> > `git stash list`, inspected with `git stash show`, and restored
> > (potentially on top of a different commit) with `git stash apply`.
> > -Calling `git stash` without any arguments is equivalent to `git stash
> > save`.
> > +Calling `git stash` without any arguments is equivalent to `git stash
> > push`.
> > A stash is by default listed as "WIP on 'branchname' ...", but
> > you can give a more descriptive message on the command line when
> > you create one.
> > --
> > 2.13.1
> >
