"W. Trevor King" <[email protected]> writes:
> e379fdf3 (merge: refuse to create too cool a merge by default,
> 2016-03-18) gave a reason for *not* passing options from pull to
> merge:
>
> ...because such a "two project merge" would be done after fetching
> the other project into some location in the working tree of an
> existing project and making sure how well they fit together...
Read the above again and notice the phrase "two project merge". The
reasoning applies only to the --allow-unrelated-histories option.
It gave a reason for not passing *THAT* option and nothing else, and
does not mean to say anything about passing or not passing any other
options.
That is why I said the reference to that commit was irrelevant in
the context of this patch.
If you find somebody saying "we should not pass --signoff from pull
to merge" when we taught "--signoff" to "merge", then that may be
worth referring to, as this commit _will_ be changing that earlier
decision. I however do not think that is a case. Just saying
"merge can take --signoff, but without pull passing --signoff down,
it is inconvenient, so let's pass it through" is sufficient to
justify this change.
> diff --git a/t/t5521-pull-options.sh b/t/t5521-pull-options.sh
> index ded8f98dbe..82680a30f8 100755
> --- a/t/t5521-pull-options.sh
> +++ b/t/t5521-pull-options.sh
> @@ -165,4 +165,44 @@ test_expect_success 'git pull
> --allow-unrelated-histories' '
> )
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'git pull does not add a sign-off line' '
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr src dst" &&
> + git init src &&
> + test_commit -C src one &&
> + git clone src dst &&
> + test_commit -C src two &&
> + git -C dst pull --no-ff &&
> + ! test_has_trailer -C dst HEAD Signed-off-by
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'git pull --no-signoff does not add sign-off line' '
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr src dst" &&
> + git init src &&
> + test_commit -C src one &&
> + git clone src dst &&
> + test_commit -C src two &&
> + git -C dst pull --no-signoff --no-ff &&
> + ! test_has_trailer -C dst HEAD Signed-off-by
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'git pull --signoff add a sign-off line' '
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr src dst" &&
> + git init src &&
> + test_commit -C src one &&
> + git clone src dst &&
> + test_commit -C src two &&
> + git -C dst pull --signoff --no-ff &&
> + test_has_trailer -C dst HEAD Signed-off-by "$GIT_COMMITTER_NAME
> <$GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL>"
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'git pull --no-signoff flag cancels --signoff flag' '
> + test_when_finished "rm -fr src dst actual" &&
> + git init src &&
> + test_commit -C src one &&
> + git clone src dst &&
> + test_commit -C src two &&
> + git -C dst pull --signoff --no-signoff --no-ff &&
> + ! test_has_trailer -C dst HEAD Signed-off-by
> +'
> +
> test_done
> diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> index 1701fe2a06..08409b1c25 100644
> --- a/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> @@ -726,6 +726,49 @@ test_must_be_empty () {
> fi
> }
>
> +# Call test_has_trailer with the arguments:
> +# [-C <directory>] <object> <token> [<value>]
> +# where <object> is an object name as described in gitrevisions(7),
> +# <token> is a trailer token (e.g. 'Signed-off-by'), and
> +# <value> is an optional value (e.g. 'A U Thor <[email protected]>').
> +# test_has_trailer returns success if the specified trailer is found
> +# in the object content. If <value> is unset, any value will match.
> +#
> +# Both <token> and <value> are basic regular expressions.
> +#
> +# If the first argument is "-C", the second argument is used as a path for
> +# the git invocations.
> +test_has_trailer () {
> + INDIR=
> + case "$1" in
> + -C)
> + INDIR="$2"
> + shift 2 || error "<directory> not specified"
> + ;;
> + esac
> + INDIR="${INDIR:+${INDIR}/}"
> + OBJECT="$1"
> + shift || error "<object> not specified"
> + TOKEN="$1"
> + shift || error "<token> not specified"
> + SEP=':' # FIXME: read from trailer.separators?
> + CONTENT="$(git ${INDIR:+ -C "${INDIR}"} cat-file -p "${OBJECT}")" ||
> error "object ${OBJECT} not found${INDIR:+ in ${INDIR}}"
> + PATTERN="^${TOKEN}${SEP}"
> + if test 0 -lt "$#"
> + then
> + VALUE="$1"
> + PATTERN="${PATTERN} *${VALUE}$"
> + fi
> + if (echo "${CONTENT}" | grep -q "${PATTERN}")
> + then
> + printf "%s found in:\n%s\n" "${PATTERN}" "${CONTENT}"
> + return 0
> + else
> + printf "%s not found in:\n%s\n" "${PATTERN}" "${CONTENT}"
> + return 1
> + fi
> +}
The reason why I suggested a simple "sed -n -e ...p" you used in
your original was because it could be used to extract not just one
Signed-off-by: lines to store in >actual, to be compared with an
expect that has multiple S-o-b lines and the output is in correct
order, etc. An elaborate filter that can onlyl give "found/not
found" boolean looks a bit over-engineered for no real gain.
> # Tests that its two parameters refer to the same revision
> test_cmp_rev () {
> git rev-parse --verify "$1" >expect.rev &&
