Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Thomas Gummerer <t.gumme...@gmail.com> writes: > >> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we >> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better >> to point new users of git stash to the more modern (and more feature >> rich) interface, instead of teaching them the older version that we >> might want to phase out in the future. > > With devil's advocate hat on, because the primary point of "stash" > being "clear the desk quickly", I do not necessarily agree that > "more feature rich" is a plus and something we should nudge newbies > towards.
I do not particulary view "feature richness" is the primary benefit of 'push' that makes it shine. 'save' has a quirk in the command line option syntax, but 'push' corrects it, and that is why we want to move users towards the latter. IOW, I do not object to the agenda; it is just I found the justification used to push the agenda forward was flawed. Thanks.
