Hi Junio, On Wed, 1 Nov 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > ... > > ( > > for x in four three > > do > > git rm $x && > > git commit -m "remote $x" || > > exit > > done > > ) && > > test 0 -eq $? && > > ... > > > > Ugly? Yes. Correct? Also yes. > > I think returning non-zero with "return" is how other tests avoid an > extra level of subshell. > Ugly? Yes. Correct? Questionable but it seems to work for those who > wrote them ;-) Given that the test_expect_* functions evaluate the code, it makes me wonder whether those `return` statements really return appropriately, or one call level too low. Ciao, Dscho
