Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> * If somebody has a working replacement URL, we could use that
>>> instead, of course. Takers?
>> A possible alternative could be
> Nice charts!
Their numbers seem to be just 'any commit by the author, with
mailmap applied', and I am of two minds with it. Counting without
"shortlog --no-merges", depending on the management style of the
project, tends to credit the integrator too much. Even though
vetting the patches and choosing when to merge the topics is a
significant contribution, it isn't *that* big compared to the work
done by the contributor who took initiative to scratch that itch.
With or without "--no-merges", the big picture you can get out of
"git shortlog -s -n --since=1.year" does not change very much, but
the headline numbers give a wrong impression.
And of course, application of the mailmap is very important, if you
want to get meaningful numbers out of shortlog over a longer period.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html