On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Elijah Newren <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I have to walk through the debugger and inspect the values found in
> here in order to figure out their meaning, despite having known these
> things inside and out some years back, then they probably need a comment
> for the casual reader to explain their purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <[email protected]>
> ---
> merge-recursive.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
> index 52521faf09..3526c8d0b8 100644
> --- a/merge-recursive.c
> +++ b/merge-recursive.c
> @@ -513,6 +513,28 @@ static void record_df_conflict_files(struct
> merge_options *o,
>
> struct rename {
> struct diff_filepair *pair;
> + /*
> + * Because I keep forgetting every few years what src_entry and
> + * dst_entry are and have to walk through a debugger and puzzle
> + * through it to remind myself...
This repeats the commit message; and doesn't help me understanding the
{src/dst}_entry. (Maybe drop the first part here?) I'll read on.
> + *
> + * If 'before' is renamed to 'after' then src_entry will contain
> + * the versions of 'before' from the merge_base, HEAD, and MERGE in
> + * stages 1, 2, and 3; dst_entry will contain the versions of
> + * 'after' from the merge_base, HEAD, and MERGE in stages 1, 2, and
> + * 3.
So src == before, dst = after; no trickery with the stages (the same
stage number
before and after; only the order needs to be conveyed:
base, HEAD (ours?), MERGE (theirs?)
I can understand that, so I wonder if we can phrase it to mention (base,
HEAD, MERGE) just once.
> Thus, we have a total of six modes and oids, though some
> + * will be null. (Stage 0 is ignored; we're interested in handling
s/will be/may be/ or /can be/?
> + * conflicts.)
> + *
> + * Since we don't turn on break-rewrites by default, neither
> + * src_entry nor dst_entry can have all three of their stages have
> + * non-null oids, meaning at most four of the six will be non-null.
Oh. That explains the choice of /will be/ above. Thanks!
> + * Also, since this is a rename, both src_entry and dst_entry will
> + * have at least one non-null oid, meaning at least two will be
> + * non-null. Of the six oids, a typical rename will have three be
> + * non-null. Only two implies a rename/delete, and four implies a
> + * rename/add.
That makes sense.
Thanks,
Stefan
> + */
> struct stage_data *src_entry;
> struct stage_data *dst_entry;
> unsigned processed:1;
> --
> 2.15.0.5.g9567be9905
>
