Matthieu Moy <[email protected]> writes: > My point in cc907506 ("send-email: don't use Mail::Address, even if > available", 2017-08-23) was not that Mail::Address was bad, but that > changing our behavior depending on whether it was there or not was > really bad. For example, the issue dealt with in this thread probably > always existed, but it was present only for *some* users.
Yes, I understand and agree with you that having a single implementation would make things simpler for both users and bug wranglers than two sperate implementaions with two different sets of glitches. I am just wondering if we picked the right one back then, given this thread; that's all.
