Shawn Pearce <spea...@spearce.org> writes: >> Work it around by noticing a wildcard match that attempts to update >> a local symbolic ref and ignoring it. > > At what point should we just support symrefs on the protocol? :-(
I think it is entirely an orthogonal matter. When we learn that the other side now has this ref as a symref pointing to this other ref, an update of the local ref on the RHS of the refspec that has such a symref on its LHS will not be using the current codepath to call update_ref() to write the object name thru an existing symref. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
