Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivar...@gmail.com> writes:
> + if test "$branch_or_commit" = "HEAD" &&
> + !(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)
Did you need a subshell here? Now with a proper test with
"symbolic-ref -q HEAD", I wonder if you'd need to check if the
original was named HEAD in the first place (I do not feel strongly
enough to say that checking is wrong, at least not yet, but the
above does make me wonder), and instead something like
if ! git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
then
...
might be sufficient. I dunno.
I find what 2/3 and 3/3 want to do quite sensible. They depend on
1/3, which I find is more a needless churn than a clean-up, which is
unfortunate, though.
Thanks.
