On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:55:35PM +0100, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> > On 29 Nov 2017, at 19:35, Thomas Adam <tho...@xteddy.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 03:37:50PM +0100, lars.schnei...@autodesk.com wrote:
> >> + if (print_waiting_for_editor) {
> >> + fprintf(stderr, _("hint: Waiting for your editor
> >> input..."));
> >> fflush(stderr);
> >
> > Just FYI, stderr is typically unbuffered on most systems I've used, and
> > although the call to fflush() is harmless, I suspect it's not having any
> > effect. That said, there's plenty of other places in Git which seems to
> > think
> > fflush()ing stderr actually does something.
>
> I agree with the "unbuffered" statement. I am surprised that you expect
> fflush()
> to do nothing in that situation... but I am no expert in that area. Can you
> point me to some documentation?
Because stderr is unbuffered, it will get printed immediately.
> In any way, would all this be a problem here? The worst that could happen
> would
> be that the user would not see the message, right?
Correct -- I only bring this up because your interdiff showed you added the
fflush() call and I was merely pointing that out. I don't expect you to
change it.
> Are you aware of stderr usage in Git that could cause more trouble?
No. It'll all be fine.
-- Thomas Adam
