On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Cruft in the codebase is a problem for git *developers* because it makes
>>> the code harder to maintain and extend.
>> A problem big enough to warrant the rejection of the patch series? No.
> May I suggest you maintain remote-bzr as a separate project? You have
> total control that way without anyone's disagreeing with you.
Which disagreement? We have all agreed how the code should look like
in the end. The disagreement is on how and when this code should be
merged to git.git. A separate project is not going to help there.
> And speaking from someone whose series may take months to get
> in, why the rush?
Why the delay? Junio had already merged this code to 'next'.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html