Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <[email protected]>
---
revision.c | 3 +--
revision.h | 12 ------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index f6a3da5cd9..7239315de9 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -2860,8 +2860,7 @@ int prepare_revision_walk(struct rev_info *revs)
}
}
}
- if (!revs->leak_pending)
- object_array_clear(&old_pending);
+ object_array_clear(&old_pending);
/* Signal whether we need per-parent treesame decoration */
if (revs->simplify_merges ||
diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
index 54761200ad..27be70e75c 100644
--- a/revision.h
+++ b/revision.h
@@ -150,18 +150,6 @@ struct rev_info {
date_mode_explicit:1,
preserve_subject:1;
unsigned int disable_stdin:1;
- /*
- * Set `leak_pending` to prevent `prepare_revision_walk()` from clearing
- * the array of pending objects (`pending`). It will still forget about
- * the array and its entries, so they really are leaked. This can be
- * useful if the `struct object_array` `pending` is copied before
- * calling `prepare_revision_walk()`. By setting `leak_pending`, you
- * effectively claim ownership of the old array, so you should most
- * likely call `object_array_clear(&pending_copy)` once you are done.
- * Observe that this is about ownership of the array and its entries,
- * not the commits referenced by those entries.
- */
- unsigned int leak_pending:1;
/* --show-linear-break */
unsigned int track_linear:1,
track_first_time:1,
--
2.15.1
