Hi,
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Yasushi SHOJI <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thank you guys for insightful help. I just read the code and now I understand
> what you guys are saying. Yeah, I can say the fix is "spot on".
>
> But, to be honest, it's hard to see why you need "if (p)" at the first
> glance.
> So, how about this fix, instead?
+ for (p = list, i = 0; i < cnt; i++, p = p->next) {
Here "i" can reach "cnt - 1" at most, so ...
+ if (i == cnt) {
+ /* clean-up unused elements if any */
+ free_commit_list(p->next);
+ p->next = NULL;
+ }
... "i == cnt" is always false above. I think it should be "i == cnt - 1".
And with your code one can wonder why the cleanup is part of the loop.
> I also found a bug in show_list(). I'm attaching a patch as well.
Could you send it inline as explained in Documentation/SubmittingPatches?
Thanks,
Christian.
