Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] utf8: add function to detect a missing UTF-16/32 BOM

[Junio C Hamano]

Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes:

> "false". Therefore, "is_missing_required_utf_bom()" might be 
> lengthy but should fit.

Thanks, sounds understandable a lot better than the original ;-)